WIZS

TownTalk: Candidates for Vance County Commissioner District 4

The WIZS News team strives to bring the community important information through fair, objective and balanced reporting. We sent a list of questions to candidates in contested seats for Vance County Board of Commissioners and the Vance County Board of Education.

There are two candidates for the District 4 seat on the board of commissioners:

June Lewis, III is the Democratic candidate and Kelley Wade Perdue is the Republican candidate for the District 4 seat.

We asked candidates in contested seats for Vance County Board of Commissioners to respond to the following list of questions and statements.

 

Below are the unedited responses, in their entirety. The candidates’ responses appear in alphabetical order.

Responses from Candidate June Lewis, III

 

My decision to run for Vance County Commissioner comes from a sincere desire to serve the people of this county. My faith has taught me that service is not about recognition but about responsibility. I believe that when God gives us opportunities to make a difference, we should be willing to step forward. I see families working hard to make ends meet, emergency personnel making sacrifices to protect us, young people needing opportunities, and residents wanting their concerns heard. I am running because I believe Vance County deserves leadership that listens, encourages, respects, and works for everyone. I do not claim to have all the answers, but I am willing to listen, learn, work, and make difficult decisions with integrity.

My platform is built on three important priorities, Community Safety, Mental Wellness, and Educational Excellence.

  1. Public Safety and Emergency Services. Protecting lives must be a priority. I would support a careful evaluation of the needs of our Sheriff’s Office, fire departments, EMS, and emergency  communications. I want to see that our first responders have the staffing, equipment, training, and resources necessary to serve residents throughout the county, including rural communities.
  2. Economic Stability and Opportunity. We need jobs that allow residents to support their families and young people to build futures here. I know that we have some partnerships presently, however, I would encourage more partnerships with local businesses, Vance-Granville Community College, workforce development organizations, and prospective employers to create  meaningful employment and training opportunities.
  3. Education and Mental Wellness. Strong schools and healthy families contribute to stronger communities. I would work collaboratively with educational leaders while supporting access to mental health resources and community-based services.

I believe Vance County has so much potential, but reaching that potential requires unity, accountability, and a willingness to work together. I want to see our young people encouraged to dream beyond their circumstances. I want our first responders to feel supported, our businesses to thrive, and our families to believe they have a future here. I am passionate about strengthening communities through service, mentorship, workforce opportunities, and responsible leadership.

I support responsible economic development, but I do not believe economic growth should come at the expense of our citizens’ health, safety, property, or quality of life. Data centers may offer

economic benefits, but we must carefully consider their impact on water resources, electricity, noise, surrounding neighborhoods, and county infrastructure.

I definitely do not claim to have all of the information on data centers. I am continuing to educate myself about the proposed development, its potential benefits, and its long-term  consequences. I have not visited a data center or spoken with owners. The information I have obtained is through my independent research and listening to concerned citizens.

I would support clear, enforceable standards addressing water usage, electricity demands, noise levels, setbacks from homes, environmental protection, emergency response planning, traffic  impacts, and appropriate screening. I would also support requirements for developers to provide credible information about infrastructure needs, financial responsibility, and the potential impact on neighboring properties. I believe the Unified Development Ordinance should protect residents while establishing fair and consistent expectations for developers. If elected, I would work with fellow commissioners, planning officials, and county legal counsel to ensure these protections receive serious consideration.

Yes. If the county has not completed the necessary review and adopted adequate protections, I would support a legally justified extension of the moratorium.

From what I have observed, there have been disagreements among commissioners on important county matters. Disagreements are not necessarily unhealthy. Different perspectives can lead to better decisions when handled respectfully. However, personal differences should never interfere with the business of serving residents.We do not have to agree on everything to accomplish  something meaningful for Vance County.

I believe a productive relationship between commissioners and county staff is essential for effective government. I cannot speak to every internal interaction, but I believe communication, professionalism, and mutual respect must be prioritized.

I only see there interaction at board meetings and I believe individual commissioners should maintain professional and respectful relationships with county employees and expect the same professionalism in return.

I believe county government must be responsible with taxpayers’ money. Families are already facing increasing costs for housing, food, utilities, and other necessities. My preference is to maintain a stable tax rate whenever possible, evaluate spending carefully, and pursue revenue neutral budgeting when reassessments occur and when doing so is financially responsible.  However, revenue-neutral budgeting should not mean ignoring essential services or the county’s long-term obligations. Before supporting any tax increase, I would want a clear explanation of the need, available alternatives, and the financial impact on our residents.

I would consider a tax increase only after careful examination of essential needs, particularly those directly connected to protecting lives and maintaining critical county services. Before supporting an increase, I would expect the county to evaluate grants, state and federal funding, financing options, existing reserves, and opportunities to reduce unnecessary expenditures. A tax increase should be a last resort, not the first solution.

My priorities would be public safety and emergency services first, essential school infrastructure second, and economic development and other community needs third. I place public safety first because the ability to respond to emergencies, protect lives, and maintain safe facilities is a fundamental responsibility of county government. Education comes next because investing in safe learning environments helps prepare our children for the future. Economic development is also essential because sustainable growth can expand the tax base, create jobs, and help fund public services.

As I recently visited the jail, I noticed that they were overpopulated and understaffed. Those two barriers alone contribute to things including detention officer safety and inmate safety. I also witnessed the county maintenance teamwork in repairs and revitalization to parts of the jail as well. Though there is so much more to be done, I also celebrate progress on what has already been done. I truly believe that it is in order to build a new detention center as soon as we can.

(There was no answer in original document, and attempts to reach Lewis have been unsuccessful. WIZS will include a response if we receive one.)

My personal and professional experiences have taught me the importance of responsibility,  compassion, teamwork, and service. As a husband, father, deacon, and community member, I  understand that leadership begins with being accountable for the responsibilities entrusted to  you. My faith has taught me to treat people with dignity, listen before speaking, and make  decisions based on what is right rather than what is popular. I believe these values will help me  serve with humility, fairness, and integrity. I will bring a willingness to learn, work with others,  and put the needs of Vance County residents above personal interests.

My short-term goals include reviewing the county’s financial condition, understanding the most  urgent public safety and EMS needs, listening to residents, and building productive relationships  with fellow commissioners and county staff.

I understand that commissioners cannot control every issue affecting Vance County. However, they have significant responsibilities involving budgets, county services, capital investments, land use decisions, and oversight of county government. I will focus on those responsibilities and work collaboratively with the agencies and organizations responsible for other matters. My standards will remain consistent, honesty, accountability, respect, preparation, and fairness. I will not promise residents something that is outside the authority of the Board of Commissioners.  Instead, I will work to find solutions through cooperation and responsible decision-making.

I believe the chair should be someone who demonstrates integrity, experience, fairness, sound judgment, and the ability to bring people together. The chair must be willing to listen to every commissioner, maintain orderly meetings, respect county staff, and place the interests of Vance County above personal disagreements. Whoever demonstrates those qualities should be chair.

I want the people of Vance County to know that I am a man of faith, a family man, and someone who believes deeply in the importance of serving others. My faith has carried me through both blessings and difficult seasons of life. Those experiences have taught me that tomorrow is not promised, that every life matters, and that we should never take the opportunity to help someone for granted. I believe in encouraging people rather than tearing them down. I believe in lifting up our young people, supporting our first responders, and standing with families who are working every day to build a better life. I am running because I believe I have something meaningful to contribute. I will not make promises that I cannot keep, but I can promise to listen, to be present,

to do my homework, to treat people fairly, and to make decisions with integrity. My faith reminds me of the words found in Galatians 6:9 (KJV): “And let us not be weary in well doing:  for in due season, we shall reap, if we faint not.” I believe Vance County has a brighter future ahead, but it will require commitment, unity, accountability, and people willing to serve. Whether you live in Kittrell, Watkins, Henderson, or another part of our county, your voice matters and your concerns deserve to be heard. I believe public office is a responsibility, not a privilege to be taken for granted. My desire is to serve with faith, lead with integrity, and help build a stronger Vance County for generations to come.

————————–

Responses from Candidate Kelley Wade Perdue

I decided to run for office because I believe Vance County needs a different approach to  leadership, accountability, and long-term planning.

My platform focuses on fiscal responsibility, public safety, infrastructure, responsible economic  development, and protecting the character of our rural communities.

1st: Fiscal responsibility and government accountability: 

I believe this is the foundation for addressing nearly every other issue in Vance County.

Our county has significant financial responsibilities, and we cannot continue approaching  pending decisions without carefully examining long-term costs, staffing requirements, and the  return taxpayers receive from those investments.

As a program manager, I work with multimillion-dollar budgets and understand the importance of financial forecasting, risk assessment, and resource planning. Before approving major expenditures, I want to understand the business justification, available alternatives, long-term  operating costs, and measurable benefits.

If elected, I will push for stronger financial oversight, clearer reporting of major capital projects, and better alignment between spending and the county’s actual needs. I also want to examine opportunities to expand our tax base without continually placing additional burdens on property owners.

2nd: Public safety, EMS, and essential infrastructure: 

Public safety is a basic responsibility of county government. Residents should be confident that emergency help will be available when needed, regardless of where they live.

I’ve raised concerns regarding the removal of the ambulance stationed at Bearpond and the impact that decision may have on residents in southern Vance County.

I’ve also questioned the discussion of spending approximately $2 million on an EMS substation when staffing shortages have already affected our ability to maintain existing coverage.

Before we invest in another building, I believe we need a clear understanding of staffing, recruitment, retention, ambulance deployment, and response times. Buildings are important, but they cannot provide emergency care without trained personnel.

I will also continue advocating for our volunteer fire departments, law enforcement, and improvements to roads and infrastructure. Where roads are maintained by the state, the county needs to work more effectively with NCDOT to communicate and follow up on local needs.

3rd: Responsible Economic Growth and Protecting Our Rural Communities: 

Vance County needs a stronger economy, more job opportunities, and a broader tax base.  However, I believe we need to be selective about the types of development we bring into our  county. I support economic development, but it must make financial sense and benefit the people  who live here.

I believe Vance County has tremendous potential, but reaching that potential will require better  planning, cooperation, and a willingness to make decisions based on facts rather than  personalities or politics. I believe doing what is right even when it may not be the popular  decision.

In my career, a project is not considered successful simply because money was spent or a  deadline was met. It must accomplish what it was intended to do. I believe county government  should be evaluated the same way.

I want a “Vance” County where families feel safe, businesses have opportunities to succeed,  property owners are respected, and citizens have confidence that their government is working in  their best interest.

My position has been consistent from the beginning. I am not opposed to economic development,  technology, or bringing new investment into Vance County. I am opposed to moving forward  with major development without adequate policies and protections in place.

I was among the first to publicly request a moratorium on future data center development in  April 2026 because I believed our county needed time to address serious gaps in its development  regulations.

If a developer wants to invest in Vance County, I believe it is reasonable to expect that developer  to demonstrate how the project benefits our county and how potential negative impacts will be  addressed. This can be addressed with a Community Benefit Agreement, something that has  been previously overlooked many times.

My professional background gives me a working understanding of the technology, infrastructure,  and operational requirements associated with data centers.

As an IT and AI Program Manager, I understand that data centers are essential to digital  infrastructure, cloud computing, information storage, and artificial intelligence.

I also understand that different types and sizes of facilities have significantly different  operational requirements. These facilities depend on reliable power, cooling systems, network  connectivity, physical security, backup generation, and infrastructure capable of supporting  continuous operations.

However, managing technology programs does not make me a utility engineer or environmental  specialist. Those are areas where qualified, independent experts should provide the technical  analysis.

As it relates to Vance County, I have followed the proposed development, attended meetings,  reviewed available information, and studied the concerns. I am particularly concerned that Vance  County previously permitted data centers within certain zoning districts without adopting  comprehensive, data-center-specific development standards.

I also understand the importance of distinguishing between proposed development, approved  applications, and legally established development rights.

In my career, we identify risks before implementing major changes. We don’t wait until a  problem occurs and then attempt to write the requirements afterward. I believe that same  approach should apply to data center development in Vance County.

Yes. If elected, I fully intend to work toward establishing strong, enforceable data center  development standards within the UDO.

I believe those standards should include:

I also believe the county should require a thorough assessment of the actual financial benefit,  including projected tax revenue, permanent employment, infrastructure costs, and ongoing public  service demands. I would work with the Planning Board, county staff, legal counsel, and fellow  commissioners to develop standards that comply with North Carolina law and can be  consistently enforced. Passing an ordinance simply to say we have one is not enough. The  language must provide meaningful protection.

Yes! I support extending the moratorium if the county has not adopted adequate, enforceable  development standards before the current moratorium expires.

From my observations at public meetings, there are clear differences in opinions, priorities, and  approaches among board members. I cannot speak to private relationships between  commissioners, nor would I presume to know the intentions of individual board members What I  can speak to is the importance of professionalism and the public’s confidence in the board’s  ability to conduct business effectively.

In my career, I regularly work with executives, technical teams, vendors, and other stakeholders  who have competing priorities. My responsibility is to bring those individuals together, evaluate  the facts, resolve issues, and move the work forward. I would bring that same approach to the  Board of Commissioners.

I believe a productive relationship between the Board of Commissioners and county staff is  essential to effective government. The board is responsible for establishing policy, approving  budgets, and providing oversight. The county manager and staff are responsible for carrying out  much of the county’s daily operations. Those responsibilities are different, but they must work  together.

From my perspective as a citizen, I would like to see clear communication, timely access to  information, and greater consistency in how major operational and financial issues are presented  to the board and the public.

When commissioners are asked to approve significant expenditures or make decisions affecting  essential services, they should receive complete information, including alternatives, financial  implications, operational risks, and long-term consequences.

I believe those relationships should be professional, respectful, and based on clearly defined  responsibilities.

Individual commissioners should be able to ask questions, request information through  appropriate channels, and seek clarification before making decisions. That is part of their  responsibility to taxpayers.

My responsibility as a commissioner would not be to control daily operations. It would be to  help establish effective policies, ensure responsible use of taxpayer dollars, and hold county  government accountable for results.

At the end of the day, the board and county staff should be working toward the same objective:  serving the people of Vance County effectively and responsibly.

My position is that Vance County needs to control spending before asking property owners to  pay more.

Our current county property tax rate is $0.7129 per $100 of assessed value. While that rate  remained unchanged for the 2026–2027 budget, I believe we need to look beyond the tax rate  itself and examine how much revenue the county is collecting, where that money is going, and  whether taxpayers are receiving the best value for their dollars.

I support using revenue-neutral budgeting as an important benchmark, particularly following  property revaluations. Property owners should not automatically face a larger tax burden simply  because assessed property values increase. However, I also understand that revenue-neutral does  not mean every taxpayer’s bill stays the same, and the county must still account for legitimate  costs and required services.

I am concerned about relying too heavily on fund balance to support annual budgets. Reserves  serve an important purpose, but they are not an unlimited source of funding. Recurring expenses  need sustainable recurring revenue. Before considering higher taxes, I want a thorough review of  spending, opportunities to eliminate unnecessary costs, and a realistic long-term financial plan.

I also support broadening our tax base by recruiting businesses and industries that create jobs and  contribute meaningful revenue without creating excessive demands on county services.

I am not in favor of continually turning to property owners to solve our financial challenges!

I would consider a tax increase only as a last resort, particularly when addressing a documented  public safety need or a legally required service that cannot reasonably be funded through existing  resources.

However, identifying a legitimate need does not automatically justify approving an expensive  project or increasing taxes. Before supporting any increase, I would want to review the full  project scope, independent cost estimates, available funding sources, operating expenses, staffing  requirements, financing options, and long-term debt obligations.

I would also want to know whether the project could be completed in phases, whether existing  facilities could be improved, and whether grant funding or other financial alternatives were  available.

If an increase became unavoidable, I would expect the county to clearly explain the need,  disclose the financial impact on taxpayers, and identify exactly how the additional revenue  would be used.

I would never promise that I would vote against every tax increase under every circumstance.  That would be irresponsible without knowing the facts. But I can promise that I would not  support an increase simply because it is the easiest way to balance a budget.

If funding is limited, I believe the county must prioritize essential services and its legal  responsibilities before taking on discretionary projects.

1st: Public safety, including EMS, law enforcement, fire protection, and detention facilities 

Protecting lives must come first! Citizens deserve dependable emergency response, safe  communities, and properly equipped first responders.

This includes addressing EMS staffing shortages, ambulance coverage, detention center safety,  and the needs of our volunteer fire departments.

I have been particularly vocal about the removal of the ambulance from Bearpond and what that  decision means for residents in southern Vance County. Emergency coverage should not depend  on which part of the county someone lives in.

2nd: Education and school facilities 

Our children deserve safe, properly maintained learning environments. Education is also directly  connected to economic development, workforce readiness, and the future of our county.

I support responsible county funding for school operations and capital needs, along with  accountability for how those resources are used.

We must also strengthen relationships with Vance-Granville Community College and employers  to prepare residents for available jobs.

3rd: Essential infrastructure 

This includes critical facility maintenance, water infrastructure, communications systems, and  other infrastructure within the county’s responsibility.

Deferred maintenance often becomes more expensive over time. Addressing smaller problems  before they become major failures is generally a better use of taxpayer dollars.

Road maintenance is also important, although many of our roads fall under NCDOT’s  responsibility rather than the county’s direct control.

4th: Economic development 

Economic development is necessary for our long-term financial health, but it should be strategic  and financially responsible.

I support recruiting industries that offer good employment opportunities, strengthening our tax  base, supporting local businesses, and protecting our rural communities. However, economic  development spending must be supported by realistic projections and an understanding of the  county’s financial obligations.

These priorities are closely connected. A stronger economy can help fund better services, but we  cannot neglect essential services while waiting for that economic growth to occur.

My educational background includes a Bachelor of Science in Criminal Justice, and I have  followed the ongoing concerns regarding the Vance County Detention Center.

I understand that the current facility has experienced serious structural, security, and staffing  problems.

State inspections have identified deficiencies involving doors, locks, facility conditions, and  supervision. These concerns have resulted in restrictions on the number of inmates who can be  housed locally and the need to transfer detainees to facilities outside the county.

The escape of two inmates in June 2026 further demonstrated the seriousness of the detention  center’s problems. These issues affect public safety, detention officers, inmates, law enforcement  resources, and county finances.

I am aware that preliminary plans for a new detention center have included a proposed 300-bed  facility with an estimated cost exceeding $70 million. I also understand that the county has  established a capital reserve for the project and has explored financing options, including federal  assistance.

While I recognize that the current facility has significant problems, I believe we must carefully  evaluate the proposed replacement before committing taxpayers to decades of debt. I would want  a complete analysis of projected inmate populations, facility capacity, construction costs, staffing  needs, operating expenses, transportation costs, and long-term financing. I would also want to  examine how the current practice of housing inmates in other counties compares financially with  the costs of operating a new facility.

A new detention center may very well be necessary, but the county must be able to demonstrate  that the size, design, and financing are appropriate for our needs. I do not believe the county can  afford to continue ignoring serious safety issues. I also do not believe we should automatically  approve the most expensive solution without thoroughly examining alternatives.

My approach would be to work with the sheriff, detention professionals, county management,  financial advisors, and fellow commissioners to make an informed decision. Public safety and  fiscal responsibility should be part of the same discussion.

I believe EMS coverage should be based on actual emergency response needs, geographic  coverage, call volume, travel distances, and the availability of trained personnel.

We need to make decisions based on data rather than simply choosing locations for new  buildings.

I have been actively involved in questioning the county’s decision to remove the ambulance  stationed at Bearpond Volunteer Fire Department in July 2026. That location had provided  coverage in southern Vance County for approximately 13 years. When that unit was removed, I  began asking questions about response times, available staffing, and how emergency coverage  would be maintained for residents in that part of the county.

I am aware of the county’s plans for a future EMS and Fire headquarters and the discussions  surrounding an EMS substation in the northern portion of the county, including the Williamsboro  area. I also understand that substantial funding has been discussed for new EMS facilities.

My concern is that we are discussing millions of dollars in construction while struggling to  maintain staffing at existing locations. Before committing to additional facilities, I believe the  county needs a comprehensive EMS deployment and staffing assessment.

That assessment should include call volumes by location and time of day, actual response times,  ambulance availability, overlapping calls, recruitment and retention, overtime expenses, and  projected future demand.

I would also want to evaluate the feasibility of restoring dedicated ambulance coverage in  southern Vance County and improving coverage in other underserved areas. Our volunteer fire  departments are valuable community resources, and I believe opportunities for appropriate  partnerships should be considered.

From a management perspective, we must identify the operational need before determining the  capital investment. I am not opposed to building new EMS facilities. I am opposed to spending  millions on buildings without a reasonable plan to staff and operate them.

I believe I bring a combination of professional management experience, education, community  involvement, and a lifelong connection to Vance County.

Professionally, I work as an IT and AI Program Manager, overseeing complex, multimillion dollar programs. My responsibilities include financial management, strategic planning, risk  assessment, resource allocation, vendor management, and ensuring projects meet their intended  objectives.

I work with executives, technical teams, and stakeholders who often have different priorities.  That requires communication, problem-solving, sound judgment, and the ability to make  decisions based on facts.

I hold a Bachelor’s Degree in Criminal Justice w/ minor in Political Science, a Master’s Degree in  Project Management, and a certificate in Healthcare Management. I am also pursuing my Doctor  of Business Administration in Organizational Leadership & Project Management.

My education and professional experience have given me a strong foundation in organizational  management, leadership, financial oversight, and decision-making.

But my experience is not limited to my career!!

I serve as Treasurer of the Watkins Community Club and have been involved in community  improvement and volunteer efforts for many years. I have served as a state & district  chairwoman for the Arts and Culture Community Service Program with GFWC-NC, and I have  worked with Adopt-A-Highway for more than two decades.

I am also actively involved with Hermon Community Church, where I assist with  communications, church activities, and committee work.

These responsibilities have taught me the importance of listening, following through, managing  limited resources, and working with people from different backgrounds.

I also understand what it means to be a citizen dealing with county government. I have  personally experienced the frustration of seeking answers, questioning decisions, and trying to  understand the policies that affect property owners. I believe those experiences have made me  more determined to improve communication and accountability.

I bring experience managing major programs, but I also bring the perspective of someone who  has lived in Vance County her entire life. Both matter!

My immediate priority would be to develop a thorough understanding of the county’s financial  obligations, existing projects, staffing challenges, and operational needs.

I would focus on reviewing the current budget, capital improvement plan, debt obligations, and  the status of major proposed expenditures. EMS coverage would be an early priority. I would  seek detailed information about staffing, response times, unit placement, and opportunities to  improve service in underserved areas. Another priority would be reviewing the detention center’s  capital plans and financial projections to understand both the immediate safety needs and the  long-term cost to taxpayers. I would also support improvements in public communication,  including making budget information, major project updates, and county decisions easier for  citizens to understand.

Long-term goals: Two to four years and beyond 

My long-term goal is to help establish a more financially stable, efficient, and accountable  county government.

I want to see a realistic capital improvement strategy that prioritizes needs, identifies funding  sources, and accounts for long-term operating expenses before projects are approved. I also want  Vance County to develop a more competitive economic development strategy that brings quality  employers, expands our tax base, and creates career opportunities for our residents.

Protecting farmland and rural communities will remain important to me. We need development  standards that support growth without sacrificing the property rights and character of our  communities.

I would like to see stronger partnerships between county government, our schools, Vance Granville Community College, local employers, emergency service providers, and community  organizations.

Ultimately, I want the county to become more proactive rather than constantly reacting to  problems. In my career, strategic plans are only meaningful when there are defined  responsibilities, realistic timelines, and measurable outcomes. I would like to bring more of that  thinking into our county’s long-term planning.

I believe effective leadership begins with understanding the responsibilities and limitations of the  position. A county commissioner is responsible for establishing county policy, approving  budgets, adopting ordinances within the county’s authority, making certain appointments, and  providing oversight of county government. Commissioners do not individually manage county  departments or direct the daily work of employees. I understand that distinction, and I believe  respecting it is essential to effective government.

In my professional career, I am responsible for achieving results while working within defined  budgets, policies, governance structures, and organizational responsibilities. I would apply those  same principles as a commissioner.

When presented with a major expenditure, I will ask what problem we are solving, whether the  proposed solution is appropriate, what alternatives were considered, and how success will be  measured.

I believe in reviewing supporting information rather than voting solely on recommendations or  assumptions. I also believe in accountability. If the board approves a major project, there should  be clear expectations regarding financial reporting, schedules, project status, and measurable  results. I would support regular updates on significant capital projects and greater transparency in  how taxpayer dollars are spent.

My job would be to help establish good policies, approve responsible budgets, and provide  meaningful oversight.

I believe the chair of the Board of Commissioners should be someone who demonstrates  experience, sound judgment, professionalism, and the ability to lead a group of individuals with  different opinions. Someone who is not newly elected!

At this point, I believe it would be premature to commit to a specific individual before the  election results are known and the composition of the board is determined.

I was born and raised in the Watkins community, and Vance County has always been my home.  My family’s history here goes back more than 200 years, and I take pride in that heritage. I love  Vance County! I want to be the good, I want to be a change!

I have worked hard for my education and professional accomplishments, and I believe those  experiences have prepared me to contribute meaningfully to county government.

My career has taught me how to manage budgets, develop plans, assess risk, work with different  personalities, and solve complex problems. My personal life has taught me patience,  perseverance, compassion, and the importance of standing up for what matters.

I respect the responsibility that comes with public office, and I understand that earning  someone’s vote does not automatically earn their continued trust. That trust must be maintained through actions. If elected, I will bring the same work ethic, attention to detail, and  accountability to this position that I expect of myself professionally and personally.

CLICK PLAY!

Exit mobile version